Startup · protection status
Halide Robotics, Inc.
Startup · two legal entities · coverage as of August 15, 2026 · 9:42 AM PT
Insured at FEB
$500,000
across 2 of 2 legal entities
- Insured
- $500,000
- Above entity limits
- $3,040,000
- Not counted
- $0
within per-entity limits
not placed · above entity limits
no open reviews
An incoming wire of $1,800,000 from Two Rivers Capital, LP is announced for today, 3:00 PM PT. This position does not include it — review the projection.
Deposit placement
Not enrolled
- Above entity limits
- $3,040,000
- Placed through the network
- $0
- Not placed
- $3,040,000
eligible to place
reciprocal
sits above the limits
Deposit placement spreads the balance above an entity’s limit across a network of other banks. It changes nothing about the accounts here — only where the amount above the limit sits. Until enrolled, $3,040,000 sits above the limits.
Where the coverage comes from
FDIC insurance is per depositor, per bank, per ownership category. Each legal entity is its own depositor with its own $250,000 limit, and all of an entity’s accounts aggregate into it.
| Entity | Balance | Insured | Above limit | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Halide Robotics, Inc. Delaware C-Corp | $3,200,000 | $250,000 | $2,950,000 | Insured to the limit |
| Halide Federal Systems, LLC Delaware LLC | $340,000 | $250,000 | $90,000 | Insured to the limit |
Why it isn't the full ceiling
2 counting entities × $250,000 is a ceiling of $500,000. This relationship realizes $500,000.
Every counting entity is at or above its limit, so the full ceiling is realized.
Compared with an entity-blind platform
A platform that treats the relationship as one depositor reports $250,000 insured on this same book. Recognising the entities that already exist accounts for the difference of $250,000.